| |
Universal Knowledge
NATASHA LAKAEV HAS NOT BEEN INVOLVED WITH THE RUNNING OF
UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE COURSES SINCE 1998. UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE PURCHASED THE
IP RIGHTS TO USE THE COURSE INFORMATION FROM NATASHA LAKAEV.
WE WOULD LIKE TO SINCERELY APOLOGISE FOR THE UNFORTUNATE WAY THAT NATASHA
LAKAEV`S NAME HAS BEEN DRAGGED INTO THE CURRENT DEFAMATION OF UNIVERSAL
KNOWLEDGE BY A COUPLE OF UNSAVOURY INDIVIDUALS.
BELOW IS A SERIES OF APOLOGIES THAT NATASHA LAKAEV HAS RECEIVED FROM WARREN
DENNY (SOLICITOR) AND ANNETTE DENNY (NURSE), WHO POSTED THE ORIGINAL
DEFAMATORY INFORMATION ON THE INTERNET, AND FROM MEDIA MOUSE WHICH OWNED
ONE OF THE OFFENDING WEBSITES.
WE WOULD LIKE TO POST THIS INFORMATION ON OUR HOME PAGE TO DO WHAT EVER WE
CAN TO PROVIDE NATASHA LAKAEV WITH SOME FORM OF RECOMPENSE FOR WHAT HAS
HAPPENED TO HER REPUTATION AND LIFE AS A RESULT OF JUST A FEW INDIVIDUALS
FABRICATING INFORMATION IN ORDER TO TAKE THE SCENT OFF THEIR OWN ILLEGAL
ACTIONS AND/OR PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP ISSUES.
THE DEFAMATORY ACTIONS OF THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE A RESULT OF THE ACTIVE
SHAREHOLDERS OF UNIVERSAL KNOWLEDGE ATTEMPTING TO `CLEAN UP THE SHIP` IN
ORDER TO MAINTAIN A PROFESSIONAL PROFILE AND COMPANY STRUCTURE FOR INCOMING
COURSE PARTICIPANTS. IT HAD COME TO LIGHT TO THE COMPANY THAT THERE WERE A
NUMBER OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PEOPLE TRAINED AS INSTRUCTORS AND SUPPORT STAFF
THAT HAD UNDERTAKEN ILLEGAL ACTIONS AND/OR HAD RELATIONSHIP/FAMILY ISSUES
THAT WERE INTERFERRING WITH THE REPUTATION AND THE RUNNING OF THE COMPANY.
WHEN THESE INDIVIDUALS WERE REQUESTED TO LEAVE THE ORGANISATION FOR A
PERIOD OF TIME TO SEEK PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION BEFORE RETURNING, THEY
TOOK OFFENSE TO THE REQUEST AND ATTACHED THEMSELVES TO THE ORIGINAL FALSE
DEFAMATORY INFORMATION PUT FORWARD BY THE MEDIA IN 1998, AND BEGAN CLAIMING
THE COMPANY WAS A CULT.
WE FULLY SUPPORT NATASHA LAKAEV IN HER LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST SUCH
INDIVIDUALS AND MEDIA ORGANISATIONS TO BRING THEIR ACTIONS TO JUSTICE AND
WE WILL PROVIDE WHATEVER INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED FOR THE COURT
CASE.
AS TIME GOES ON THE SUBVERSIVE ACTIONS OF THESE OFFENDERS WILL BE RELEASED
SO THAT THE HISTORY AND EVIDENCE CAN BE FULLY UNDERSTOOD.
IF YOU WISH TO OBTAIN MORE INFORMATION ON THESE MATTERS PLEASE CONTACT ALEX
PAINE ON alexpaine2011@gmail.com
ANITA CARROLL
DIRECTOR
IMPORTANT NEWS - FORMAL APOLOGY - 21ST SEPTEMBER
2011
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
To Whom it May Concern,
We would like to make you aware of the current circumstances concerning the
defamation of Natasha Lakaev.
A court case has been under way to sue two particular individuals that
started the defamatory behaviour, malicious actions, inappropriate comments
and other types of incitement.
The two individuals have now provided a full signed
APOLOGY and letters written to the websites and newspapers,
requesting that they remove the defamatory material and that they publish a
copy of the Apology.
The Apology and Letters can be viewed, downloaded and printed at
the following website that someone has been kind enough to create:
ANOTHER APOLOGY (also see below) has also been provided by Media
Mouse for publishing the defamatory information on their blogging website.
This website was also closed down by the proprieter after providing this
apology.
The evidence (including computer hard drive inspections) clearly indicates
that the defamatory actions came from only a couple of individuals
masquerading as a number of people under a variety of different names.
If you have information regarding the people involved in the defamation of
Natasha Lakaev, whether that be verbally, in writing (or over the internet)
or by other means please contact the following solicitor:
Bruce MacDonald
GPO Box 4651
Sydney NSW 2001
Phone (02) 9232 6767
Fax (02) 9232 6776
bruce@macdonaldlawyers.com.au
Your knowledge regarding this behaviour is important. How far back your
memory goes is not an issue. All of your information, even if it may seem
irrelevant, is vital. We are gathering information from 1997 onwards.
Should any of the individuals described here have been in contact with you
by email, paper mail, telephone, in person or by chance meeting (or phone
calls) at your place of work, your home or in the street it is very
important that the above solicitor be contacted.
It is time that greater restrictions be placed on the internet and media,
so that sensationalist stories cant just be written based on opinion rather
the researched facts from both sides of the story.
If you would like to live in a kind, fair and appropriate community then
this may be your opportunity to do something morally correct. No one should
be treated in this manner (especially when it is the product of
heresay).
We all have the right to stand against bullying and harassment, no matter
what form it may come in.
Thank you for you time
See the following scanned image of a formal apology from a blogging
site that was actively involved in the defamation of Universal Knowledge
and Natasha Lakaev under the guise of anonymity.
It is our belief that if something is factual that a person will attach
their actual name to it. Hopefully this will be the setting of the stage
for something to change globally in terms of confabulation about innocent
individuals and their family members.
As you can see below the legal proceedings that have taken place have
resulted in the blogging site being closed down. Hopefully this is the
beginning of a global movement regarding unsubstantiated claims and
statements about good quality people by vindictive personalities who hide
behind anonymity. If you have something to say, step forward with the
evidence with your name and face attached to it. Otherwise go about your
business.
PEOPLE WHO "CRY WOLF" ABOUT BEING IN A CULT
In research of cults many academics hold strong views and have conducted
research on the strange behaviour of people who belonged to groups they
claim to be cults. The following excerpts provide insight into the thinking
of those few people who cry wolf of Universal Knowledge and Natasha Lakaev
to cover up their own lies and inadequacies, yet do so much unnecessary
damage with this behaviour. The following is an excerpt on such research,
and if you read beyond the excerpt there is an important formal apology to
Natasha Lakaev and Universal Knowledge from a website on which defamatory
information was published:
The role of outspoken former members of groups they report as cults, has
been widely studied by social scientists. Former members in some cases
become public opponents against their former group. The former members`
motivations, the roles they play in the anti-cult movement, the validity of
their testimony, and the kinds of narratives they construct, are
controversial with some scholars who suspect that at least some of the
narratives are colored by a need of self-justification, seeking to
reconstruct their own past and to excuse their former affiliations, while
blaming those who were formerly their closest associates,[81] and that
hostile ex-members would invariably shade the truth and blow out of
proportion minor incidents, turning them into major incidents.
Scholars that challenge the validity of critical former members testimonies
as the basis for studying a religious group include David G. Bromley, Anson
Shupe, Brian R. Wilson, and Lonnie Kliever. Bromley and Shupe, who studied
the social influences on such testimonies, assert that the apostate in his
current role is likely to present a caricature of his former group and that
the stories of critical ex-members who defect from groups that are
subversive (defined as groups with few allies and many opponents) tend to
have the form of -captivity narratives- (i.e. the narratives depict the
stay in the group as involuntary). Wilson introduces the atrocity story
that is rehearsed by the apostate to explain how, by manipulation,
coercion, or deceit, he was recruited to a group that he now condemns.
Introvigne found in his study of the New Acropolis in France, that public
negative testimonies and attitudes were only voiced by a minority of the
ex-members, who he describes as becoming -professional enemies- of the
group they leave. Kliever, when asked by the Church of Scientology to give
his opinion on the reliability of apostate accounts of their former
religious beliefs and practices, writes that these dedicated opponents
present a distorted view of the new religions, and cannot be regarded as
reliable informants by responsible journalists, scholars, or
jurists.
If you want to know the truth about what has happened to Natasha Lakaev and
her family go to the following links.
|
|
